A WATCHDOG has called on Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board to pay out £10,000 after a woman suffered "serious injustices" and "poor post-operative care."
The Public Services Ombudsman for Wales announced the recommendation today in a public interest report about an investigation into the care and treatment provided to a patient by the health board.
The Ombudsman launched an investigation after Mr B complained that the health board failed to provide appropriate and timely treatment to his wife (Mrs B) after she was admitted to hospital with suspected appendicitis.
During the investigation, the watchdog found there had been:
- a failure to provide Mrs B with the expected level of care after the surgery to remove her appendix
- a failure to identify the underlying cause of Mrs B’s breathing difficulties and to provide appropriate and timely treatment
- a failure to recognise signs that Mrs B’s condition was deteriorating and to take appropriate action
- and that, on a balance of probabilities, Mrs B’s cardiac arrest and lengthy admission to the Intensive Care Unit would likely have been avoided if she had received appropriate care.
The Ombudsman was concerned that these events took a considerable toll on Mrs B’s physical and mental wellbeing.
Mrs B had been left with health and mobility problems that she would not have expected to have to cope with in her 50s and which may significantly limit her quality of life for years to come.
The Ombudsman believed that Mr B had also suffered significant injustice through the distress he experienced during his wife’s admission and afterwards, in adapting to the need to provide ongoing physical and psychological support to her.
During the investigation, a concern arose that the Health Board had failed to arrange appropriate follow-up and treatment for Mrs B in response to a scan in September 2017.
As a result, the Ombudsman used the recently introduced “own initiative” power to extend the investigation to look at the concern, of which Mr and Mrs B had been entirely unaware.
The “own initiative” investigation found that, in response to the scan result, the Health Board should have arranged to remove Mrs B’s appendix but failed to do so.
As a result, there was a missed opportunity to avoid the deterioration in Mrs B’s health which occurred after she developed appendicitis in 2019.
Public Services Ombudsman for Wales, Michelle Morris, said: “This sad case demonstrates why the 'own initiative' power is needed, in the public interest, and for individuals who come to our office.
"Mr and Mrs B were entirely unaware of the missed finding on the CT colonography, and the problem was not identified during the Health Board’s own investigation of the complaint.
"Had my office not started an 'own initiative' investigation to consider this, this significant failing leading to serious injustice to Mr and Mrs B would otherwise not have come to light.”
The Ombudsman recommended that Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board should apologise to Mr and Mrs B and pay them £10,000 to reflect the serious injustices arising from the missed CT colonography finding in 2017 and the poor post-operative care in 2019.
MOST READ:
- Town "seriously split" over forthcoming 20mph changes, says speedwatch leader
- All the mobile speed camera locations in area this month ahead of new 20mph limit
- Bin collections could be 'majorly impacted' as further strikes announced for Wrexham
The Ombudsman also recommended that the report should be shared with the First and Second Consultants for the purposes of reflection and discussion at their next annual appraisals, in addition to providing evidence to her office that the report has been discussed at a surgical clinical governance meeting and appropriate learning points shared with relevant clinical teams.
Carol Shillabeer, Interim Chief Executive at Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, said: “On behalf of the Board I wish to apologise for the failings in the care provided which this report highlights.
“We accept all of the Ombudsman’s recommendations and are taking key steps to address the issues as part of our efforts to improve services.”
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article